'Salem's Lot, Illustrated Edition this question feed

asked by paradiselove on November 15, 2006 8:45 AM
Stephen King's second book, 'Salem's Lot (1975)--about the slow takeover of an insular hamlet called Jerusalem's Lot by a vampire patterned after Bram Stoker's Dracula--has two elements that he also uses to good effect in later novels: a small American town, usually in Maine, where people are disconnected from each other, quietly nursing their potential for evil; and a mixed bag of rational, goodhearted people, including a writer, who band together to fight that evil.

Simply taken as a contemporary vampire novel, 'Salem's Lot is great fun to read, and has been very influential in the horror genre. But it's also a sly piece of social commentary. As King said in 1983, "In 'Salem's Lot, the thing that really scared me was not vampires, but the town in the daytime, the town that was empty, knowing that there were things in closets, that there were people tucked under beds, under the concrete pilings of all those trailers. And all the time I was writing that, the Watergate hearings were pouring out of the TV.... Howard Baker kept asking, 'What I want to know is, what did you know and when did you know it?' That line haunts me, it stays in my mind.... During that time I was thinking about secrets, things that have been hidden and were being dragged out into the light." Sounds quite a bit like the idea behind his 1998 novel of a Maine hamlet haunted by unsightly secrets, Bag of Bones. --Fiona Webster


Reviews

Thumb_up
Thumb_down

0%
0%
It's been years since I read this one but I remember reading it late at night and being afraid to step out of bed to turn out the light. Never has a novel made me so afraid of my own shadow. It was an easy read and maybe a little simplistic but it was still a great horror novel.
reviewed by maxwell on November 21, 2006 12:38 AM

Thumb_up
Thumb_down

0%
0%
First let me say that I love Stephen King. I read a lot of King's work as a kid and then read Pet Sematary a few months ago. I was every bit as enthralled with Pet Sematary as I was with The Stand, The Shining, The Dead Zone, etc., as a kid. But Salem's Lot lacks depth. The vampire story is totally cliche. The main characters are wooden and there are so many minor characters they are very hard to keep track of. The vampires are like cartoon characters. There are no good plot twists, and no surprises. I wanted everyone to die and the vampires to win. That's how much I cared about the main characters. It was still kinda fun to read but I was glad it was over when I finished. A recent vampire novel, The Historian, although very flawed, is much creepier and better than this.
reviewed by perfectstorm on November 24, 2006 6:21 AM

search

 
 

browse

book tags