Random House Webster's Large Print Dictionary 
asked by carrots on November 25, 2006 10:43 PM
Specially designed to be easy on the eyes, Random House Webster's LARGE PRINT Dictionary is an indispensable reference for the visually impaired or anyone who has difficulty reading normal type.
Includes over 35,000 concise, authoritative definitions for use in school, home and office
Offers the most common everyday vocabulary together with scientific, technical and professional terms
Conforms to the specifications of the NAVH (National Association for the Visually Handicapped)
Provides supplemental material including major U.S. cities, weights and measures, signs and symbols and a list of U.S. presidents
Introducing a New-Words section with the most current words and word usage
Includes over 35,000 concise, authoritative definitions for use in school, home and office
Offers the most common everyday vocabulary together with scientific, technical and professional terms
Conforms to the specifications of the NAVH (National Association for the Visually Handicapped)
Provides supplemental material including major U.S. cities, weights and measures, signs and symbols and a list of U.S. presidents
Introducing a New-Words section with the most current words and word usage
Reviews
0%
0%
For more entries, and bigger letters you would buy a tome sized dictionary. This dictionary is very nice for an office reference. It has enough word entries, and is small enough to serve that purpose.
reviewed by redapple on November 28, 2006 9:33 AM
0%
0%
This dictionary is a disappointment to people who have trouble reading normal print dictionaries. With half the number of entries of other dictionaries, no pronunciation key for entries, no etymology and extremely bare bones definitions, this dictionary is completely useless. I wish that the publishers would issue a large print dictionary in as many volumes as would be necessary to contain all the information of a standard print dictionary. My eyes are bad but my brain is fine.
reviewed by bookworks on November 28, 2006 7:48 PM