In a biography on Madison I read that every day of his life after the Consitutional Convention he was asked to reveal the notes he had taken of the debates, and not until well after he and every one else present at the convention died, in 1840, did Madison allow these notes to become public. Others had surrepticiuosly taken notes of the procedings, but none were substantial. Everyone knew Madison's notes would reveal the truth about what happened during the Constitutional debates.

I actually didn't have that hard a time reading the text, as I was expecting the worst. Admittedly, I only read the first two hundred pages and scattered sections. The text is over 600 pages long, though it is nicely broken up by days during the four month long marathon.

The text of the debates does have its entertaining moments. It was fascinating to hear the leading men of the day discuss the plusses and minuses of various rules for structuring their nation to be.

My major criticism of this particular edition is that there is no background information given on each of the "combatants" at the debates or explanatory footnotes within the text. The more I read on the founding of the United States, the more I realize that there were many politicians besides Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, etc. These lesser-known men's lives are very relevent and interesting, too, and I felt that I would have gotten more out of the reading if I had known more about the characters and the local background of the issues at that time. I do plan on returning to the Notes of the Debates in the future.

Othewise, the text can only be rated at 5 stars.

add (2/12/06): I would highly suggest reading "Decision in Philadelphia" by Collier and Collier if you are unfamiliar with the participants and issues in the 1787 Consitutional Convention. It is an excellent book and an extremely easy read.

This book is an excellent historical account of the decisive event that created our American form of government-the democratic republic.A complete understanding of the nature of the debate between the conservatives(George Washington,Alexander Hamilton,Thomas Jefferson,James Madison,Benjamin Franklin,John Jay)and the Libertarians(George Mason,William Randolph,Thomas Jefferson,Patrick Henry,Thomas Paine,and,for a time,John Hancock)is necessary in order to fully grasp what was at stake in 1787.A reader who purchases this book is also urged to purchase The Federalist Papers,written by Hamilton,Madison, and Jay.The great and inherently conflicting differences between Conservatism and Libertarianism , given that they are different political and economic philosophies, were put on full display at this convention in 1787.For instance,the conservatives favored a strong central government,strong executive branch,a strong,independent central bank to regulate currency and banking,and the establishment of federal excise taxes in order to fund the federal government.Hamilton later instituted an economic development and industrial-manufacturing growth policy based on high tariffs(import taxes).The Libertarians favored an extremely weak "federal"government, like that established by the Articles of Confederation,a weak executive branch,free banking,no national currency,and no federal government power to tax.This last issue was not decided until Washington ,acting as our first elected president, had to personally lead Federal troops to put down the Libertarian revolt, called the Whiskey rebellion, in Western Pennsylvania in 1793-1794.The revolt was based on the claim that the federal excise tax on whiskey,a tax that had been passed by the first Congress ,was an illegal seizure of private property.This revolt had a number of similarities to the earlier 1786-1787 revolt led by Daniel Shays that had revealed the major weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.Fortunately,the conservatives(Washington and Hamilton) won the day while the libertarians lost.