Michael Palin Diaries 1969-1979 this question feed

asked by ragtop on November 2, 2006 10:43 PM
Michael Palin has kept a diary since newly married in the late 1960s, when he was beginning to make a name for himself as a TV scriptwriter (for the Two Ronnies, David Frost etc). Monty Python was just around the corner. This first volume of his diaries reveals how Python emerged and triumphed, how he, John Cleese, Graham Chapman, the two Terrys - Jones and Gilliam - and Eric Idle, came together and changed the face of British comedy. But this is but only part of Palin's story. Here is his growing family, his home in a north London Victorian terrace, which grows as he buys the house next door and then a second at the bottom of the garden; here, too, is his solo effort - as an actor, in Three Men in a Boat, his writing endeavours (often in partnership with Terry Jones) that produces Ripping Yarns and even a pantomime. Meanwhile Monty Python refuses to go away: the hugely successful movies that follow the TV (his account of the making of both The Holy Grail and the Life of Brian movies are pager-turners), the at times extraordinary goings on of the many powerful personalities who coalesced to form the Python team, the fight to prevent a American TV network from bleeping out the best jokes on US trasmission, and much more - all this makes perceptive, funny and rivetting reading.


Reviews

Thumb_up
Thumb_down

0%
0%
I must agree with the other review posted so far - this is a huge and boring book. I was very excited when I saw it in the bookstore, bought it on impulse, and began to read it only to find that, yes, I was finding out way too much about what Michael had for dinner that day. Also way too many observations about weather and English towns and English politics and the Palin family. The Python stuff is described so matter-of-factly that there seems to be no joy of discovery in creating the groundbreaking material that still stands as the comedy gold standard today. Perhaps that was the way it was when the Python group did the work. If the rest of the book had some resonance beyond Python, that would still make it worthwhile as a published volume. But it doesn't and it really isn't. Michael is a huge talent whose great gifts are revealed in his comedy work, not in these monotone - but well-worded! - ramblings.
reviewed by learner on November 27, 2006 11:43 PM

Thumb_up
Thumb_down

0%
0%
Being a python fan, I was looking for more nuggets about the group and the writing process, but this book revealed little of interest. Poorly edited ramblings about dinners and meetings with BBC nonentities, plus Michael's love of British socialism make it a really tough read. The phrase champagne socialist comes to mind. Not recommended unless you are a huge python fan. Michael should stick to his day job - brilliant script writing.
reviewed by skywalker on November 28, 2006 1:55 AM

search

 
 

browse

book tags