Landis on Mechanics of Patent Claim Drafting 
asked by tacos on October 29, 2006 11:14 PM
Landis on Mechanics of Patent Claim Drafting provides you with the uniquely clear, complete, and systematic guidance that enables you to avoid problematic terms and structural problems and draft the most effective claims for any kind of invention. Landis spotlights preferred claim drafting practices and techniques and stylized words and definitions that have gained validity over the years through case law, custom, and PTO rules and memoranda. Equally useful to seasoned patent attorneys and newcomers to the field, Landis offers: - Start-to-finish directions for each type of claim apparatus or machine, method or process, composition of matter, article of manufacture, and biotechnology - Model claims for computer inventions, biotechnology inventions, machines, processes, plants, design, and much more - Advice on reviewing your claims so that you catch errors and weed out superfluous language - Real-world examples of dependent claims, Jepson claims, generic and species claims, subcombination claims, and more - Technical dos and donts that help you steer clear of typical claims traps and pitfalls - Quotations from claims on appeal and in litigation that illustrate limitations and phrases which have been approved or rejected - Discussions of case law behind various non-art rejections, covering both classic rules and modern trends As always, Landis gives you the very latest word on patent claim drafting, including a new sample exercise for drafting business method claims. Youll learn new ways to deal with claims that involve numerical ranges -- how to understand the different treatments of preamble language, including the CAFCs Catalina Marketing guidelines -- how the CAFC treated the unusual Markush grouping in the Abbott Laboratories case -- how the CAFC interprets "substantially", "essentially", "similar", and other words of approximation, and why "about" has been held not to be per se indefinite -- why not only "more" and "less" but also "rich" and "high" are comparative words -- how PTO Utility Examination Guidelines address the issue of utility standards for gene and gene fragment patents -- and how new case law affects means or step clauses, alternative expressions, and product-by-process claims. Plus, the text has been redesigned and reorganized for ease of use.
Reviews
Filing a patent application comprises essentially three parts; writing the disclosure and drawings, drafting the claims, and filing the required work and fees with the Patent Office (which includes dealing with the office actions, if any). This book focuses exclusively on the second of these three parts, writing the claims. The claims are the legal heart of the patent, since they will define exactly what is, and what is not, covered by the patent; the application will be rejected if the claims are too broad, or not supported, or fail to be specific in pointing out the invention; on the other hand, the patent will be useless if the claims are insufficiently inclusive, and a product can bypass the detailed claimed invention. This book covers the details of exactly how to write a good patent claim, that will satisfy the requirements of the U.S. Patent office, describe the invention clearly and distinctly point out the novel features, and cover the invention sufficiently to stand up in court. It is the classic how-to reference for the practicing patent agent or lawyer.
reviewed by 90210 on November 9, 2006 2:01 PM
This book is awesome for patent drafters. It's clear, concise and has EVERYTHING you need to know. Fantastic desk reference!
reviewed by tacos on November 9, 2006 5:12 PM
