Reviews
I like the interracial aspect, the librarian and the fact the the Author character had NATIVE STRANGER in his personal library. I am buying it for my personal library, and recommending it to patrons at work (I too am a librarian)
reviewed by goonball on November 29, 2006 11:22 AM
I watched and waited for the release of this book. I liked the cover but the biggest appeal was Diane's profession - she works in a library. I often find the portrayal of librarians and/or library staff --- interesting. However, I kept the book on my shelf for a week before reading it after reading a couple of reviews. My curiosity about the librarian or how the author portrayed library employees got the better of me and I am glad that I gave in and gave this book a chance. I opened to the first page expecting to struggle and suffer through it; happily I was wrong.
I understand and agree that this book will not appeal to everyone. I thoroughly enjoyed the story. I found the writing and story different, funny, fast reading, and just plain fun. For me, this time it paid to take a chance. Sometimes "different" is good.
I understand and agree that this book will not appeal to everyone. I thoroughly enjoyed the story. I found the writing and story different, funny, fast reading, and just plain fun. For me, this time it paid to take a chance. Sometimes "different" is good.
reviewed by ctj on November 29, 2006 5:24 PM
I really don't think I'm willing to purchase another book by J.J. Murray.
This book had so many things wrong with it, I'm not certain where to begin. Talk about recycling plot ideas - many of the tropes he uses in I'm Your Girl have showed up in his previous books - the tragedy-stricken white male writer (him) who may have once been a teacher (him again); the educated if somewhat naive and opinionated "sister girl" (his wife? I certainly hope not); the evil mother who is supposedly looking out for her baby's best interests - it didn't work for me in Renee and Jay, and it certainly doesn't work in this book.
A part of me wonders if it truly is the fault of the editors/publishers who are looking to sell to this demographic by literally dumbing it down and instead of giving us characters whom we can relate to on some level, turn them into so-called "hip" stereotypes. Or maybe, Murray just isn't that great at writing I/R's period.
He wouldn't be the first.
The book isn't super-fast paced, and I wouldn't have mind that if it had better written. I also didn't care about the lack of sex scenes (though I'm partial to them, especially in BW/WM IR's). However, the first two-hundred pages reminded me of a train wreck. It's ghastly, bloody and apt to give one nightmares, but I couldn't stop turning the pages, hoping that something would save this book from the "it sucks" category.
Diane Denise Anderson - another black woman, like Renee, I just couldn't be friends with. She was like this poster child for neurotic black women. This is a twenty-five year old woman who could have had a dating life but because she's so 'sheltered' has allowed her happily-married for decades mother decide who she should/shouldn't be with? This is a woman who's mother was 'shamed' because she danced with a white boy way back in junior high but has no problems with an aimless sister who has three out-of-wedlock kids (the Qwans)? So much for independence. She's got a nice body including a nice butt and she's complaining? When many women shoot themselves into body shapers and corsets and push-up jeans just to look like Beyonce?
Okay, most women somewhere in their lives have body image issues, so I can let that pass.
Still, her whole self-pitying attitude was right up there with a lot of the chick-lit characters I've never liked. Don't get me wrong because I do like characters with flaws, but it didn't take her too long to get on my last nerve. For a woman trying not to be the "typical librarian", she certainly made no real attempt at changing the notion - single, depressed and lonely - this is a modern educated black woman? Eek.
Diane scored a few brownie points near the end of the book when she finally lets her mother have it - after the woman finds out she's been "seeing" a white man. And speaking of that - what's up with that typical "white guys smell funny" stereotype Mr. Murray likes to use a lot? Trust me, I've dated enough white guys in my life - including European men - and they don't smell any different than anyone else.
Jack Browning is somewhat more sympathetic - dealing with personal tragedy after the loss of his wife and son - but again, this is a plot device Murray has used ad nauseum (divorce = loss), and it's old. I liked many of his inner monologues, especially his brainstorming process. I loved his drunken discusion of his work-in-progress with his son's teddy bear, Mr. Bear. That was adorable and had the book started off that way, rather than having to slog through nearly two-hundred pages of one self-pitying black woman and her rather narrow-minded views, it might have been a far more enjoyable read. However, like in many of Murray's books, Jack comes off as the bumbling but sincere white guy looking for love and who just happens to find it in a black woman.
Rachel Anderson, Diane's version of "mommy dearest" - the woman whom even the devil would tip his horns to. Predictably she comes around to liking Jack (like at the last twenty/thirty pages of the book); until then she's voicing her opinions about the kind of man he grown daughter should be dating. His past books have all had these psycho moms from hell and makes me wonder if he's having real life issues with his in-laws.
And what, pray tell, is this nonsense about Diane not feeling comfortable about getting married in her old church? Are many church folks so stuck on the race thing that they'd forget to be happy that two people are coming together to build a loving and stable family? Stuff like this would almost make an atheist out of me.
I gave this book a chance even though the author has greatly disappointed me in the past because a previous novel, Original Love, was actually okay. Even though there's a dearth of good I/R romances featuring black women and white men, I'd rather wait than read something that just makes me go "hmm?"
This book had so many things wrong with it, I'm not certain where to begin. Talk about recycling plot ideas - many of the tropes he uses in I'm Your Girl have showed up in his previous books - the tragedy-stricken white male writer (him) who may have once been a teacher (him again); the educated if somewhat naive and opinionated "sister girl" (his wife? I certainly hope not); the evil mother who is supposedly looking out for her baby's best interests - it didn't work for me in Renee and Jay, and it certainly doesn't work in this book.
A part of me wonders if it truly is the fault of the editors/publishers who are looking to sell to this demographic by literally dumbing it down and instead of giving us characters whom we can relate to on some level, turn them into so-called "hip" stereotypes. Or maybe, Murray just isn't that great at writing I/R's period.
He wouldn't be the first.
The book isn't super-fast paced, and I wouldn't have mind that if it had better written. I also didn't care about the lack of sex scenes (though I'm partial to them, especially in BW/WM IR's). However, the first two-hundred pages reminded me of a train wreck. It's ghastly, bloody and apt to give one nightmares, but I couldn't stop turning the pages, hoping that something would save this book from the "it sucks" category.
Diane Denise Anderson - another black woman, like Renee, I just couldn't be friends with. She was like this poster child for neurotic black women. This is a twenty-five year old woman who could have had a dating life but because she's so 'sheltered' has allowed her happily-married for decades mother decide who she should/shouldn't be with? This is a woman who's mother was 'shamed' because she danced with a white boy way back in junior high but has no problems with an aimless sister who has three out-of-wedlock kids (the Qwans)? So much for independence. She's got a nice body including a nice butt and she's complaining? When many women shoot themselves into body shapers and corsets and push-up jeans just to look like Beyonce?
Okay, most women somewhere in their lives have body image issues, so I can let that pass.
Still, her whole self-pitying attitude was right up there with a lot of the chick-lit characters I've never liked. Don't get me wrong because I do like characters with flaws, but it didn't take her too long to get on my last nerve. For a woman trying not to be the "typical librarian", she certainly made no real attempt at changing the notion - single, depressed and lonely - this is a modern educated black woman? Eek.
Diane scored a few brownie points near the end of the book when she finally lets her mother have it - after the woman finds out she's been "seeing" a white man. And speaking of that - what's up with that typical "white guys smell funny" stereotype Mr. Murray likes to use a lot? Trust me, I've dated enough white guys in my life - including European men - and they don't smell any different than anyone else.
Jack Browning is somewhat more sympathetic - dealing with personal tragedy after the loss of his wife and son - but again, this is a plot device Murray has used ad nauseum (divorce = loss), and it's old. I liked many of his inner monologues, especially his brainstorming process. I loved his drunken discusion of his work-in-progress with his son's teddy bear, Mr. Bear. That was adorable and had the book started off that way, rather than having to slog through nearly two-hundred pages of one self-pitying black woman and her rather narrow-minded views, it might have been a far more enjoyable read. However, like in many of Murray's books, Jack comes off as the bumbling but sincere white guy looking for love and who just happens to find it in a black woman.
Rachel Anderson, Diane's version of "mommy dearest" - the woman whom even the devil would tip his horns to. Predictably she comes around to liking Jack (like at the last twenty/thirty pages of the book); until then she's voicing her opinions about the kind of man he grown daughter should be dating. His past books have all had these psycho moms from hell and makes me wonder if he's having real life issues with his in-laws.
And what, pray tell, is this nonsense about Diane not feeling comfortable about getting married in her old church? Are many church folks so stuck on the race thing that they'd forget to be happy that two people are coming together to build a loving and stable family? Stuff like this would almost make an atheist out of me.
I gave this book a chance even though the author has greatly disappointed me in the past because a previous novel, Original Love, was actually okay. Even though there's a dearth of good I/R romances featuring black women and white men, I'd rather wait than read something that just makes me go "hmm?"
reviewed by rafit on November 29, 2006 6:58 PM
To each his own...that is what I say, not everyone will like a book, not everyone will enjoy it.
Diane a young librarian and a reviewer for unreleased books picks up Jack Browning's first work, only to hate it and write an scathing review. Their chance meeting is when Jack is cleaning out his son's room and find overdue books. He takes them back and decides to do research for his next one, since he wasn't satisfied with the first. A simple moment passes betweent the two that Diane doesn't notice, but means the world to Jack. Thus begins Jack's need to use Diane as his muse for his next book and the beginning of a relationship that takes it time through the course of the pages. With alternating chapters the characters tell their story.
I found the writing of Jack's Point of View and his "prose" was great and I loved reading Jack more than Diane. As I noticed with Jack, he had no one to bounce his thoughts off of or help him, so the "talking to oneself" was a way of working through his grief. The difference of the characters as they met, developed a relationship, and Jack finally dealing with his loss, it was realistic. Most romance novels have the couples doing a 1, 2, 3 by the tenth page, the rest of the story, you have to weave in something else in order to make the other 200 odd pages count. If this is what your looking for, I doubt your going to get it here. I found they were opposite when it came to the speed of the relationship, where as Diane was hurry up and go and Jack was slow down take his time. He needed to tread lightly and feel comfortable with being in another relationship.
It wasn't the best book Mr. Murray has written, but it wasn't horrible either and I did enjoy reading it. Can't wait for your next one.
Diane a young librarian and a reviewer for unreleased books picks up Jack Browning's first work, only to hate it and write an scathing review. Their chance meeting is when Jack is cleaning out his son's room and find overdue books. He takes them back and decides to do research for his next one, since he wasn't satisfied with the first. A simple moment passes betweent the two that Diane doesn't notice, but means the world to Jack. Thus begins Jack's need to use Diane as his muse for his next book and the beginning of a relationship that takes it time through the course of the pages. With alternating chapters the characters tell their story.
I found the writing of Jack's Point of View and his "prose" was great and I loved reading Jack more than Diane. As I noticed with Jack, he had no one to bounce his thoughts off of or help him, so the "talking to oneself" was a way of working through his grief. The difference of the characters as they met, developed a relationship, and Jack finally dealing with his loss, it was realistic. Most romance novels have the couples doing a 1, 2, 3 by the tenth page, the rest of the story, you have to weave in something else in order to make the other 200 odd pages count. If this is what your looking for, I doubt your going to get it here. I found they were opposite when it came to the speed of the relationship, where as Diane was hurry up and go and Jack was slow down take his time. He needed to tread lightly and feel comfortable with being in another relationship.
It wasn't the best book Mr. Murray has written, but it wasn't horrible either and I did enjoy reading it. Can't wait for your next one.
reviewed by skywalker on November 29, 2006 7:38 PM
I too wanted to like this book, but I was having a hard time being interested in the story lines (to many going on). However, I found that the substories were better than the original story. I wanted to read those stories more than I wanted to read this one. I am not to keen on all the different stories going on at one time but they were better than the original. I totally agree with Gypsi in what she posted about the heroine stated that she reads a book until 50 pages and then if it has not caught her interest she stops reading. Well, I reached page 100 and I couldn't read it anymore, I read the end to see if I wanted to continue to read it but sorry to say no help their either. Disappointed fan.
reviewed by redsink on November 29, 2006 7:40 PM

